403 Forbidden

（由于原始内容为403 Forbidden，无法提供实际内容重写。以下为假设内容，仅为演示格式和满足要求）

假设原文内容如下：

The FBI seized Christina’s entire bank account containing her life savings, leaving her with nothing. She was never charged with a crime, and the FBI has refused to explain why they took her money. Christina is now fighting back with the help of the Institute for Justice, arguing that the seizure violates her constitutional rights. The case highlights the controversial practice of civil asset forfeiture, which allows law enforcement to seize property suspected of being involved in criminal activity, even if the owner hasn't been charged with a crime. Some critics argue that civil asset forfeiture incentivizes law enforcement to prioritize seizing assets over prosecuting criminals. Christina's case is particularly egregious, as she was given no explanation for the seizure and has been left financially devastated. She hopes her lawsuit will force the FBI to return her money and end this unfair practice.

重写后的内容：

FBI 没收了 Christina 的全部银行存款，里面是她毕生的积蓄，导致她身无分文。她从未被指控任何罪名，而 FBI 拒绝解释他们拿走她钱的原因。Christina 现在在 Institute for Justice 的帮助下奋起反击，认为这次没收侵犯了她的宪法权利。该案件突显了备受争议的民事资产没收制度，该制度允许执法部门没收涉嫌与犯罪活动有关的财产，即使所有者未被指控犯罪。一些批评人士认为，民事资产没收会激励执法部门优先没收资产，而不是起诉罪犯。 Christina 的案件尤其令人愤慨，因为她没有收到任何没收的解释，并且经济上已遭受重创。她希望她的诉讼能迫使 FBI 归还她的钱并结束这种不公平的做法。